The fear of Afghanistan's partition has shattered Mrs. Shukria Barakzai's sweet dreams.
Author: Soraya Baha, writer and critic.
When Joe Biden expressed his sociological impression of the ethnic characteristics of the people of Afghanistan, he bluntly stated that the people of this land cannot unite. This is not the first time he has said this, and he is not the only one, other US leaders and their advisers have said that the people of Afghanistan are not inclined towards unity. Even Alexander the Great was of the opinion and this objective fact cannot be denied by the tenacity of Afghan nationalism.
This terrible paradox is a consequence of Britain's historical role in our country, which forced a nation with a reactionary tribal culture, without qualifications or knowledge, to rule and dominate the destinies of the majority of the people of Afghanistan for several centuries. Russia and Pakistan followed suit.
Everyone has a question: what is the advantage and peculiarity of this nation that all external enemies and colonialists choose it?
History answers these questions: this nation will do anything to gain power. Brother blinds brother, father and son kill each other, sell land, commit suicide and explosions, grow drugs, and keep people, especially women, from science and knowledge. At the behest of colonialism, they are burning the country and region with proxy wars. Why does colonialism need artificial robots when there are such alive terrible robots?
Let's return to the troubling state of Ms. Shukria Barakzai, the darling of the media, who in an interview with Afghanistan International today was concerned about the fear of the partition of Afghanistan spoiled her sweet dreams.
In this program, the reporter focuses on Joe Biden's statement about why "the people of Afghanistan are not united?" The discussion was not about dividing Afghanistan, but rather than giving a clear answer to the question of why there is no unity, Mrs. Barakzai is angry at Joe Biden and takes aim at the threat of partition. From the heights of the intellectual she descends into the depths of her tribal identity, knowing that sooner or later this mechanical and false unity, which is nothing more than a whirlpool, will collapse.
Now the world has realized that these people cannot be united and that oppressed people have no other way but to divide. It is no longer possible, under the pretext of unity, to endure the iron heels of the tribe on your ribs for hundreds of years. Eventually, this unity based on the slavery of other nations will come to an end.
Mrs. Barakzai is caught in a paradox, fearing disintegration, may no longer be an honored guest of Resistance Front and Tajik meetings and be thrown into Greater Pashtunistan, where women have no individual and human identity and are only “siyosars” (black-headed).
