The Americans brought Ashraf Ghani to power in the same way that they removed him in their own interests, and the only loyalty that the United States showed to please his best friend Khalilzad was not to let him be killed
Author: Farid Younes
On August 15, I was in Europe when Kabul fell, and on that day I wrote a Facebook post that Ashraf Ghani did not want to be hanged like Najib. Later in his video message, he admitted that he could have been killed.
The fact that he left Kabul to avoid bloodshed is not justified, because according to the deal, the whole country was to be surrendered to the Taliban without a war, and the last point, Kabul, was part of it. As Taliban foreign ministry spokesman Abdul Kahar Balkhi told Al Jazeera, "We didn't seize power by force, it was handed over to us" (the October 9 interview was posted on YouTube).
Ashraf Ghani was brought to power by influential American friends and Jewish lobbies in the US and UK. The Associated Press reported that large sums of money were spent in the United States prior to Ghani's election. People like failed diplomat Richard Holbrook (who died in 2010), the US Special Representative for Pakistan and Afghanistan, fought hard for Ghani in Washington to bring him to power. Holbrook worked hard to become US Secretary of State, but he was not lucky.
In addition, at the time, the Deputy Secretary of Defense of the United States, there was one Jew named Dov Zakhiem, who, in fact, as a clergyman, was both the Deputy Secretary of Defense of the United States and a staunch supporter of Israel. He said: "Ghani is the man of America!"
One of the most powerful elements in the West is the press, which is largely controlled by Jewish capitalists. The media in America can make a man (God forgive me) God, or discredit him so much that he won't even raise his head. For example, when Time magazine presents a person as Man and Woman of the Year on the back cover, it is considered one of the greatest accolades in America. This is in the case that this is just one magazine of one capitalist, and the propaganda in this regard is so great that everyone takes some kind of idiot for a saint.
It was the English magazine Prospect Magazine in 2013 who named Ashraf Ghani a “top-thinker” - an outstanding thinker. All of these hoaxes were aimed at getting Ghani to power, and the New York Times in its issue of August 18, 2009 wrote that Ashraf Ghani is one of the most educated and pro-Western candidates for the presidency of Afghanistan.
Just like the Americans overthrew the Taliban in 2001, they brought it back to power in one deal. And just as the Americans brought Ashraf Ghani to power, they removed him for their own interests, and the only loyalty the United States showed to please his best friend Khalilzad was to keep him from being killed.
One of the reasons for the fall of Ghani was his selfishness, which was known to the Afghans close to him in his circle, and the Americans too, and the United States, especially President Donald Trump, certainly did not like this character of his.
Ghani was not a shrewd politician, and in many ways, instead of being diplomatic and quiet, he was stubborn. Ridiculous screams during speeches indicated his weak nerves and stubbornness. To a greater extent, this spirit is shared by most Afghans, even religious people who are nervous in the stands.
The Afghans are the winner on the battlefield, but they always lose at the negotiating table because of their stubbornness and nervousness. This mistake was also made by Sardar Mohammad Davudkhan, who at the negotiating table with Brezhnev became nervous and left the room, which the Afghans are very proud of. Afghans never think that diplomacy is not war or stubbornness. Diplomacy is used to ensure that a person calmly, humbly, with gentleness and clearly chosen phrases, achieves his goal. If not for the stubbornness and anger of Davudkhan, the republic might not have fallen.
Ashraf Ghani was no longer useful to the United States, and his friend from his student years in Beirut, Khalilzad, had to keep his position because he worked mainly for two sources: first, the United States, because he was the US envoy in Afghanistan, and, secondly, to his own people - the Pashtuns, among whom he did not have a single supporter. That is why many Pashtunists, not Islamic Pashtuns, call Khalilzad "famous politic", while he is a traitor to those Pashtuns who are not Pashtunists because he gave Afghanistan with both hands to the Taliban.
The reason why Ashraf Ghani was saved by the CIA is because Ashraf never did or said anything against the United States. The Shah of Iran made this mistake when, in an interview with American journalist Mike Wallace, who was Jewish, he stated that the United States was controlled by the Jewish lobby. It was then that after this interview, not only unrest began in Iran, but even when the Shah of Iran left the country, the United States forbade him to enter its territory.
Ashraf Ghani was overthrown by the US commandos, just as he was brought to power by them, but was saved because he was "loyal" and his trip to the UAE was already planned. The flight of heads of state is not a new phenomenon in world history or in the history of Afghanistan. But since Afghanistan is an ethnic and tribal country, this is not called a political decision, but a lack of courage.
