For the information war against Tajikistan, they were already preparing not only in Kyrgyzstan but also in Ukraine.
In the photo: one of the anti-Tajik video signs in the Kyiv metro
Author: Talib Aliyev, especially for "Sangar"
Films about the Second World War, especially about the Battle of Kursk, the blockade of Leningrad, the echelons of enemy tanks, long trenches, poured with mud, and bloodied soldiers on the front line ... talk about the most terrible tragedy ever experienced by humanity.
But today's military operations are radically different from the battles of the twentieth century. They are real Network-centric warfare (a single and closed information space, satellites, instant data transfer, etc.), supported by a very active and even aggressive accompaniment of all the actions of the troops in the information space. And here, as they say, all means are good, because the winners are not judged.
We recently observed a very similar picture during the armed conflict on the Tajik-Kyrgyz border. The authorities of Kyrgyzstan launched an unprecedented information campaign against Tajikistan, accusing the Tajik border guards of invading their territory. The President of Kyrgyzstan, Sadir Japarov, enlisted the support of his (apparently, already overseas) new patrons, on September 21 this year, he spoke at the 77th session of the UN General Assembly with accusations of Tajikistan's aggression. At the same time, in the days of the armed conflict, all state and private media of Kyrgyzstan tirelessly broadcast their version of what was happening, overwhelming up to the point of absurdity. Moreover, this action unexpectedly joined ... Ukraine. From September 14 this year, pre-prepared videos about the “invasion” of Tajikistan into Kyrgyzstan, the use of civilians by the Tajik army as a “human shield”, etc. were broadcast at the stations of the Kyiv Metro!
And what is the unprecedented antitajik campaign in Ukrainian social networks? The created and promoted telegram channels by Western political technologists, all as one declared aggression of Tajikistan against “defenseless” Kyrgyzstan.
In all these events, the similar Hollywood nature of the creation of news and high-profile statements is traced. Ukraine is now an arena of the battle of Eastern and Western civilizations, which is explained by the fact that it is on the basis of this country that the main fakes are being formed for conducting information misinformation. What are the template provocations of the Kyiv regime on Russian accusations of atrocities in the cities of Buch and Izyum? The Ukrainian side deliberately, despite the numerous appeals, did not take the bodies of its dead troops in the Kharkiv region in order to later give them out "for victims among the civilian population as a result of Russian aggression." Of course, at the entrance to the city of Izyum, Russian servicemen buried the bodies of the Ukrainian military, because the command of the Armed Forces of Ukraine deliberately refused to accept them. It was this process that was recorded on video and then presented as “Russia covering up its tracks.”
Even the Western media were then forced to make excuses and apologize for replicating information stuffing by the Ukrainian side. So, the message about the discovery in Izyum of "the dead with a noose around their necks" had to be removed from their feed and refuted by the Reuters news agency, as well as the German edition of Frankfurter Rundschau. In turn, journalists from the British Daily Telegraph, who worked in Izyum, admitted that they had not found evidence of the genocide of the local population by the RF Armed Forces.
In the photo: the Ukrainian telegram channel "covers" the conflict on the Tajik-Kyrgyz border
Correspondent for The Guardian and The Washington Post, Liz Cookman, who covers events in the Kharkiv region, writes on her Twitter page about the discovery of the bodies of dead military personnel, not civilians.
The symbol of "Russian aggression" in Izyum, created according to Western manuals - the hand of an allegedly killed civilian with a bracelet in the form of a Ukrainian flag - also turned out to be a fake since, in reality, it is a fragment of the body of a serviceman of the Armed Forces of Ukraine buried in a mass grave.
To promote the topic of “genocide of the population of the Kharkiv region by the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation”, numerous fake accounts were hastily created on various social networks, and on September 16 of this year. Kyiv attracted foreign journalists to film the staged exhumation of civilians allegedly killed by Russian soldiers. In addition, pro-American PR agencies (PR Network, Yorktown solutions, SKDK, PRCA, Campaign Asia) were actively involved in order to replicate anti-Russian theses for a Western audience.
According to Ukrainian refugees, the vast majority of civilians buried in the Kharkiv region died as a result of shelling by the Armed Forces of Ukraine, as well as indiscriminate fire from nationalists and mercenaries during the offensive.
At the same time, Kyiv does not even hide the purpose of its informational provocations, openly demanding the West increase the supply of weapons. According to the head of the office of the President of Ukraine Mykhailo Podolyak, after the discovered graves, “does anyone else want to freeze the conflict instead of sending tanks?”
However, Sadir Japarov, just like a blueprint, does not hide the goals of his informational provocations against Tajikistan - to obtain even more weapons from NATO countries to protect against the "aggression" of Tajikistan. Just this question was discussed by the Ambassador of Kyrgyzstan to Turkey Kubanchibek Omuraliev, when on September 21 this year met with the head of the Turkish defense industry, Ismail Demir.
The recipe for confronting such wars of the 21st century is the unity of the people and the exposure of fake stuff aimed at misleading people. And this is a direct path to the creation of "color revolutions", the danger of which was warned by the head of China, Xi Jinping, at a meeting of the SCO heads of state in the city of Samarkand in September of this year.
Indeed, what the leaders of Kyrgyzstan are doing to please their supporters on the other side of the ocean and in spite of the interests of the regional powers and their neighbors, has led this country to a dead end, opening a shortcut for another “revolution”. There are still conscientious leaders in Kyrgyzstan who do not allow their country to turn into a "Second Ukraine" - a toy in the hands of the West and curb the plan of "war to the last Kyrgyz".
