The movement for the right to self-determination of Persian speakers considers federalism to be an incomplete system that does not serve the interests of Tajiks, Hazaras, and other Persian speakers.
Author: Fayaz Bahraman Najimi, international analyst, member of the Sangar Advisory Board
The main goal of the Movement for the Right to Self-Determination of Persian Speakers (RPSP), which is a political and civilizational movement, is to protect the fundamental rights of Persian speakers, as well as the right to an independent political geography and an independent government for them so that they can be their own rulers in their own Persian land.
The main point of the DPSP is that the definition of the political framework of Afghanistan's fake colonial geography is in the hands of the Afghans/Pashtuns. As long as this name dominates this geography, from an international and national point of view, Afghanism/Pashtunism will benefit from it and determine the fate of other ethnic groups in a tragic and cruel way, as it has been in the history of several hundred years.
🔆 The DPSP has a goal for the Persian speakers to build their own political structure, the Persian-speaking nation has many virtues of being the ruler of its own destiny.
🔆In addition, the Movement for the Right to Self-Determination sees politics as gradual, respecting political realities. For this reason, welcomes every step of the program of political ideology that will save Persian speakers from the evils of the politics of Afghan-Pashtun authoritarian centralism.
🔆 Federalism, which today is shouted out by part of the Persian-speaking society and presented as a political program, is facing several serious troubles in the country:
1 - The producers of this political program still do not have a clear definition of the system of federal administrative division and have not answered the questions: is the system ethnocentric? Or is language-oriented? Or is based on the territory?
2 - Another disadvantage of federalism is that it divides Persian speakers into several federated states, thus helping to revive their local identity and divide the Persian-speaking society.
3 - Another negative is that there is no executive guarantee behind this because the Afghanists/Pashtunists have shown that they do not believe in any political, or civil rules and peaceful coexistence. Whenever they come to power, they break the rules and destroy the federal system, just as they destroyed elections with millions of fraud during the Republic time.
4 - The great harm of federalism lies in the fact that it does not save Persian speakers from the Pashtun political framework, but shapes the political life of Persian speakers within the same framework as the Afghan/Afghan/Pashtun identity.
Despite these shortcomings, the DPSP welcomes the fact that federalism is a step forward from the Afghan-Pashtun authoritarian central system and was done to help Persian speakers only for gradualism in realist politics, but does not consider it the ultimate goal and ideal.
The policy of the Right to Self-Determination Movement is that every Persian speaker who fights for the honor and pride of Persian speakers should support and cooperate, but never forget the principle of the right to self-determination and the ideal of an independent Persian state.
