Countries in crisis make sacrifices not for freedom, but to protect the interests of major powers.
Author: Abdul Naser Noorzad, Security and Geopolitics Researcher, specially for Sangar
The political transformation in the United States after Trump's election, the Middle East, and Ukraine developments - nothing can happen without a previous background. It is equally obvious that Afghanistan's unexpected fall under the control of the Taliban terrorists was foreshadowed.
The situation is developing so that the game's influence on one field instantly and surprisingly affects the situation on the other field. At least, the discussion of the "division of zones of interest between the great powers" shows that the centers of conflict are not preserved for victory and defeat, but for scoring points between them. The principle of the game between these powers is a win-win. Reaching an agreement between China and Russia on how the United States will decide to continue the game cannot be a routine and unpredictable task.
So it can be said unequivocally that the complexity of the situation in the centers of conflict is caused by the creation of a crisis and its management by the major powers. The use of aggressive instruments in the game and the creation of a suspicious and dusty atmosphere to score points leads to the need to preserve these forces. For example, in the debate on Afghanistan, the question of whether the Taliban will stay or go depends on the mutual understanding between the powers, since playing the Taliban card is a useful political and security program for all parties at the moment. In addition, the instrument of extremism at the core of the game between the powers can only be an attempt at geopolitical engineering, full of conditions for the powers that benefit from it.
There is no doubt that, like Jolani in Syria after Assad, the Taliban version will remain in power for the sake of a new geopolitical engineering of the region. The Middle East and the geography of Afghanistan are the two main reasons for the continuation of this competition due to its importance. In essence, it is a game between powers in which faces become famous or disappear in the minds. Even with the distortion of the old boundaries, the modern image of the extreme is drawn without a return to the past.
In my opinion, the question of the tribe (Pashtuns in Afghanistan - Sangar) and the establishment of its hegemony is no longer subject to discussion. Under the shadow of the great doctrine of destabilization and plundering the national wealth of countries in crisis, false revolutions are organized that seem to have a popular character.
What happened in post-American Afghanistan and the planned transformation of Syria after Assad is the result of secret agreements between Russia, China, the United States, and the European Union, which pursue political, economic, cultural, and security goals. No changes in this direction can occur without a prior agreement.
The US retreat from the Afghan issue, the deadlock in Ukraine, the withdrawal of Russia and Iran from Syria - this is, in essence, a continuation of the same game on the axis of "division of spheres of interest between the great powers", which gives it the color of automatic political transformation. Therefore, it can be said that it is possible to adapt large versions that cannot have any other reason than mutual understanding between the powers.
In today's era, when civil and political disobedience is becoming more severe, the information revolution has changed the way of leading people and led them astray. Materialism and emotional selflessness are two important factors in the tyranny of nations and their peoples. Revolution and collective reaction play no role in these changes.
The people of the world, especially those in crisis, have become accustomed to autocracy, bloody games, poverty, and intellectual and material dependence on the capitalist world. There is no hope for the liberation of the suffering people. Syria, Afghanistan, Ukraine, the Middle East, etc., all of them are the result of a superficial perception of the people's reaction to the extravagance of the colonial powers, the main essence of which is to protect the interests of these powers in the context of bloody games.
